top of page

Why You Should Start PR Before Your Funding Round

Writer: Jerome Cleary
Jerome Cleary
23 hours ago
5 min read

Most founders call a PR agency right after the money hits the bank.


The round closes. The team exhales. Someone says, “Now we need press.” Then the rush begins: personal branding, media outreach, founder interviews, contributed articles, podcast bookings, LinkedIn posts, funding announcement copy, the whole package.


That instinct makes sense. A funding round feels like a news moment. It is one of the cleanest signals a startup can send to the market: people with capital believe this company has a real shot.


But here is the problem.


If you had not worked out for eight months, would you walk into a gym, load a barbell with 100 kg, about 220 pounds, and attempt a deadlift on day one while everyone watched?


Probably not.


So why do we expect media outlets to cover a startup’s funding news, understand the founder’s story, trust the company’s claims, and call the team visionary when they have never heard from them before?


PR works the same way training does. It needs warming up.


Wide-angle view of a barbell resting on a quiet gym floor.
Big PR moments need preparation before the weight goes on the bar.

Funding is a milestone, not a starting line


A funding announcement is useful. It can help with hiring, customer trust, investor confidence, and category visibility.


But it should not be the first time anyone hears your name.


By the time a round is ready to announce, the best PR work has already happened quietly in the background. Journalists have seen the founder’s point of view. Industry readers have come across the company’s thinking. Potential customers have heard the problem explained in a clear way. The market has had enough contact with the story that the funding news feels like progress, not an introduction.


When PR starts only after the round closes, everything gets compressed.


The agency has to learn the business fast. The founder has to explain the category from scratch. The messaging is still loose. Media lists are cold. There is no track record of commentary, writing, or public thinking to point to. The company wants big coverage, but the audience has no context.


That does not mean coverage is impossible. Strong funding news can still get attention, especially if the investors are notable, the amount is meaningful for the category, or the company is working on a problem people already care about.


But cold outreach around a funding round is harder than it needs to be.


A better approach is simple: start small, start earlier, and let the market get used to hearing from you before you ask it to care about your biggest moment.


Media relationships cannot be microwaved


Good PR often looks sudden from the outside.


A founder appears in a respected publication. A sharp quote lands in an industry story. A podcast host introduces them as someone worth listening to. A funding announcement gets thoughtful coverage instead of a short copy-paste mention.


Behind that moment, there is usually a long runway.


Journalists and editors need signals before they pay attention. They want to know whether a founder understands the market, can explain a problem clearly, and has something useful to say beyond “we raised money.”


They also operate under pressure. They receive too many pitches. They ignore most of them. A cold pitch from an unknown company has to work much harder than a note from a founder or agency they have already seen sharing useful, relevant ideas.


Starting PR early gives you time to build familiarity without asking for too much too soon.


That can look like:


  • Offering thoughtful commentary on industry shifts

  • Sharing data or patterns you are seeing in the market

  • Publishing founder essays that explain the problem clearly

  • Joining niche podcasts before aiming for larger ones

  • Building relationships with reporters who already cover your space

  • Creating a simple press page with clear company information

  • Tightening the founder story long before the funding announcement


None of this needs to be loud. Some of it may not get immediate attention. That is fine.


The goal is not to become famous in three weeks. The goal is to create recognition, trust, and usefulness over time.


When the funding round arrives, the pitch is no longer, “Please meet this company for the first time.”


It becomes, “Here is the next major step in a story you already understand.”


Your audience needs warming up too


Media matters, but it is not the whole game.


Your future customers, hires, partners, and investors also need time with your story.


A funding round can bring a spike of attention. The question is whether that attention lands on anything solid.


If someone reads about your raise and searches for the founder, what do they find? A thin bio? A few product posts? A company page with polished claims but no point of view?


Or do they find months of clear thinking?


That public trail matters. People rarely trust a company because of one announcement. They trust patterns. They notice whether the founder has been consistent. They look for proof that the team understands the problem from the inside. They want to see the company’s ideas before they believe its ambition.


This is where early PR overlaps with personal branding, content, and community building. Not in a forced or performative way. In a practical way.


A founder who shares useful thinking for six months has a different starting point from one who appears only when there is funding to announce.


The first founder has already given people a reason to pay attention.


The second founder is asking people to care on command.


That difference shows up everywhere. It affects how strong the announcement feels. It affects whether people share the news. It affects whether journalists can find context. It affects whether candidates get curious. It affects whether customers believe the company is serious.


Attention is easier to convert when it has been earned in advance.


Early PR does not need a large budget


One reason founders delay PR is budget.


That is fair. Before a funding round, every dollar has a job. Many startups cannot afford a full agency retainer months before they raise. Some should not try.


But starting PR early does not have to mean launching a large campaign.


It can mean building the basics.


A lean setup might include:


  • A clear founder narrative

  • A short company description that does not sound vague

  • Three to five strong story angles

  • A list of relevant journalists, newsletter writers, and podcasters

  • A monthly founder article or essay

  • A few media introductions with no immediate ask

  • A simple system for tracking conversations and coverage

  • A plan for what to say when the round is ready


That foundation reduces pressure later.


It also reveals problems before they matter. Maybe the company description is too technical. Maybe the founder story sounds generic. Maybe the category is confusing. Maybe the strongest media angle is not the one the team expected. Maybe customers respond to a different part of the message.


Finding that out after the round closes is painful.


Finding it out three to six months earlier is useful.


A basic PR budget can help sharpen the story, test the message, and build early relationships. It gives the team time to practice before the public stage gets bigger.



The funding announcement gets better when the story already exists


A funding announcement has a limited shelf life.


Once the news is out, it is out. You cannot keep relaunching the same round. That is why the preparation matters so much.


If PR starts early, the funding announcement becomes part of a larger story. The raise supports a clear direction. The founder can explain what the money will help build. The company can connect the round to a real market shift, customer pain, or product bet.


Without that groundwork, the announcement often sounds like every other announcement.


“We are excited to announce...”


“We will use the funds to grow the team...”


“We are building the future of...”


Those lines may be true, but they do not carry much weight on their own.


A stronger announcement answers better questions.





Comments


bottom of page